Which statement correctly describes the relationship between tongues and baptism evidences?

Which statement correctly describes the relationship between tongues and baptism evidences?

• A. Tongues is the first externally observable evidence, with other evidences following
• B. Tongues is the only possible evidence
• C. Tongues has no evidential value
• D. Tongues is unrelated to baptism

Answer: (A)

In this teaching, the baptism of the Holy Ghost is shown first through an outward sign—speaking in tongues. This tongues experience is viewed as the initial, externally observable evidence that God has filled the believer with His Spirit. After that initial sign, other evidences—such as further spiritual gifts, growth in holiness, boldness to witness, and transformed conduct—are believed to develop as the Spirit continues to work in the believer’s life. So the statement that tongues is the first externally observable evidence, with other evidences following, aligns with this understanding. It’s not claimed to be the only possible evidence, nor devoid of evidential value, nor unrelated to baptism.

In this teaching, the baptism of the Holy Ghost is shown first through an outward sign—speaking in tongues. This tongues experience is viewed as the initial, externally observable evidence that God has filled the believer with His Spirit. After that initial sign, other evidences—such as further spiritual gifts, growth in holiness, boldness to witness, and transformed conduct—are believed to develop as the Spirit continues to work in the believer’s life. So the statement that tongues is the first externally observable evidence, with other evidences following, aligns with this understanding. It’s not claimed to be the only possible evidence, nor devoid of evidential value, nor unrelated to baptism.