Jesus warned Peter that if he did not submit, which of the following would apply?

Jesus warned Peter that if he did not submit, which of the following would apply?

• A. Thou hast no part in me
• B. You will have no part in me
• C. Thou has no part in me
• D. Thou will have no share in me

Answer: (C)

The main idea being tested is how an ancient, direct address in biblical English expresses fellowship and submission. Jesus speaks to Peter in a way that shows personal fellowship at stake, using the old second‑person form to mark the direct address. In this line the word thou signals that Jesus is speaking to Peter one‑on‑one, and the phrase no part indicates that Peter would lose his share or participation with Jesus if he does not submit. The chosen wording mirrors that sense of exclusion from Jesus’s fellowship. The form works with the archaic style commonly found in scriptural language, where the verb form after thou shows a particular agreement for that subject and era. The use of in me rather than with me still communicates the same relationship in this old‑style phrasing, focusing on belonging to Jesus rather than merely being nearby. The other options shift the address to modern English or change the nuance: a modern you form breaks the direct, intimate address Jesus uses to Peter; a future tense changes the immediacy of the warning; and swapping part for share or altering the preposition slightly trims the exact sense of fellowship. Within the set, the choice that preserves the direct address and the sense of exclusion best aligns with how this warning is conveyed in the biblical voice.

The main idea being tested is how an ancient, direct address in biblical English expresses fellowship and submission. Jesus speaks to Peter in a way that shows personal fellowship at stake, using the old second‑person form to mark the direct address.

In this line the word thou signals that Jesus is speaking to Peter one‑on‑one, and the phrase no part indicates that Peter would lose his share or participation with Jesus if he does not submit. The chosen wording mirrors that sense of exclusion from Jesus’s fellowship. The form works with the archaic style commonly found in scriptural language, where the verb form after thou shows a particular agreement for that subject and era. The use of in me rather than with me still communicates the same relationship in this old‑style phrasing, focusing on belonging to Jesus rather than merely being nearby.

The other options shift the address to modern English or change the nuance: a modern you form breaks the direct, intimate address Jesus uses to Peter; a future tense changes the immediacy of the warning; and swapping part for share or altering the preposition slightly trims the exact sense of fellowship. Within the set, the choice that preserves the direct address and the sense of exclusion best aligns with how this warning is conveyed in the biblical voice.